<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shadow Puppets, by Orson Scott Card (2002) E</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theblackletters.net/shadow-puppets-by-orson-scott-card-2002-e/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theblackletters.net/shadow-puppets-by-orson-scott-card-2002-e/</link>
	<description>a literary blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:01:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Emera</title>
		<link>http://theblackletters.net/shadow-puppets-by-orson-scott-card-2002-e/comment-page-1/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Emera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblackletters.net/?p=1092#comment-360</guid>
		<description>Hi Maureen! Woo, thanks for your visit.

I think &lt;b&gt;Ender&lt;/b&gt;, &lt;b&gt;Speaker&lt;/b&gt;, and the first &lt;b&gt;Shadow&lt;/b&gt; are definitely the strongest in the series, with the most consistent combination of compelling plot and emotional strength. I did read the Ender side of the series up until the end and was more than obsessed with it at the time (I think I cried more times per book of that series than with any other series). But as with the Bean books, I imagine that with a more removed perspective on them now, I wouldn&#039;t like them quite as much. They are pretty tough going, not having the suspense/intrigue element of the Bean series to keep up momentum.

I wish I had the sense not to keep forcing through series, but I&#039;m an incurable completist. You&#039;re definitely good where you are, though! I think it&#039;s satisfying in some ways to know where all of the Battle School kidlets - and Peter Wiggin - end up and get a little more perspective on their personalities without Ender overshadowing everyone, but it&#039;s definitely not key to your enjoyment of the earlier books. (And as I said in the review, the vast majority of them still end up personalityless.) Actually, thinking about it, I think the most satisfying and moving part for me, at least in re-reading, has been to see Peter outside of Ender&#039;s perspective, and to see him outgrow all the horrible baggage that came along with being Ender&#039;s brother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Maureen! Woo, thanks for your visit.</p>
<p>I think <b>Ender</b>, <b>Speaker</b>, and the first <b>Shadow</b> are definitely the strongest in the series, with the most consistent combination of compelling plot and emotional strength. I did read the Ender side of the series up until the end and was more than obsessed with it at the time (I think I cried more times per book of that series than with any other series). But as with the Bean books, I imagine that with a more removed perspective on them now, I wouldn&#8217;t like them quite as much. They are pretty tough going, not having the suspense/intrigue element of the Bean series to keep up momentum.</p>
<p>I wish I had the sense not to keep forcing through series, but I&#8217;m an incurable completist. You&#8217;re definitely good where you are, though! I think it&#8217;s satisfying in some ways to know where all of the Battle School kidlets &#8211; and Peter Wiggin &#8211; end up and get a little more perspective on their personalities without Ender overshadowing everyone, but it&#8217;s definitely not key to your enjoyment of the earlier books. (And as I said in the review, the vast majority of them still end up personalityless.) Actually, thinking about it, I think the most satisfying and moving part for me, at least in re-reading, has been to see Peter outside of Ender&#8217;s perspective, and to see him outgrow all the horrible baggage that came along with being Ender&#8217;s brother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kakaner</title>
		<link>http://theblackletters.net/shadow-puppets-by-orson-scott-card-2002-e/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>kakaner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblackletters.net/?p=1092#comment-359</guid>
		<description>Welcome Maureen! We really appreciate your comment (and hopefully more to come =D)

I actually agree with you... I&#039;m pretty sure Xenocide was the book I picked up and never made it through. I&#039;m not very keen on OSC&#039;s later philosophical ramblings and forcing myself to sludge through new worlds =X I don&#039;t really like how Ender evolved as a character, although I can appreciate it. 

However, the Bean arc is *entirely* different. It&#039;s definitely more mature, but I think it retains the freshness and adventure of the original Ender book. It&#039;s much more in the same vein in terms of characters and action than the Ender arc is.  I&#039;ve totally dropped a series though for the same reason.... like Anne Rice&#039;s Vampire Chronicles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome Maureen! We really appreciate your comment (and hopefully more to come =D)</p>
<p>I actually agree with you&#8230; I&#8217;m pretty sure Xenocide was the book I picked up and never made it through. I&#8217;m not very keen on OSC&#8217;s later philosophical ramblings and forcing myself to sludge through new worlds =X I don&#8217;t really like how Ender evolved as a character, although I can appreciate it. </p>
<p>However, the Bean arc is *entirely* different. It&#8217;s definitely more mature, but I think it retains the freshness and adventure of the original Ender book. It&#8217;s much more in the same vein in terms of characters and action than the Ender arc is.  I&#8217;ve totally dropped a series though for the same reason&#8230;. like Anne Rice&#8217;s Vampire Chronicles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maureen E</title>
		<link>http://theblackletters.net/shadow-puppets-by-orson-scott-card-2002-e/comment-page-1/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>Maureen E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblackletters.net/?p=1092#comment-358</guid>
		<description>Hi, new commenter!

I haven&#039;t gotten this far in the Bean series--actually I don&#039;t know that I&#039;ll try to.  I love Ender&#039;s Game and, to a lesser extent, Speaker for the Dead (I like what that one has to say about redemption) and I also love Ender&#039;s Shadow.  But I started Xenocide and didn&#039;t finish it.  I never even picked up Shadow of the Hegemon.  Somehow OSC&#039;s shtick started to get a bit old for me even at that point.  So I&#039;d rather keep the ones I enjoyed and enjoy them than force myself to finish the series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, new commenter!</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t gotten this far in the Bean series&#8211;actually I don&#8217;t know that I&#8217;ll try to.  I love Ender&#8217;s Game and, to a lesser extent, Speaker for the Dead (I like what that one has to say about redemption) and I also love Ender&#8217;s Shadow.  But I started Xenocide and didn&#8217;t finish it.  I never even picked up Shadow of the Hegemon.  Somehow OSC&#8217;s shtick started to get a bit old for me even at that point.  So I&#8217;d rather keep the ones I enjoyed and enjoy them than force myself to finish the series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

